PARENTING FREEDOM

attachment parenting, homeschooling, gentle discipline
  • .: My Children :.

  • .: Status Updates :.

    Friday, December 21st, 2012 10:23 am

    Hundreds of hurting people visit here every day, most of whom are searching for comfort after loss. Please reach out for emotional support as you begin the healing process. Be patient with yourself. Allow yourself to grieve. Let it out. May God be with you.

  • .: Quotes :.

    Abortion stops a beating heart.
  • “Spanking children can cause long-term developmental damage and may even lower a child’s IQ.”

    | February 7, 2012

    Spanking kids can cause long-term harm-Canada study
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/07/canada-spanking-idUSL2E8D1F1C20120207

    “Spanking children can cause long-term developmental damage and may even lower a child’s IQ…”

    “‘What people have realized is that physical punishment doesn’t only predict aggression consistently, it also predicts internalizing kinds of difficulties, like depression and substance use.’”

    “‘There are no studies that show any long term positive outcomes from physical punishment.’”

    Spanking should be illegal, report says
    http://www.vancouversun.com/life/Spanking+should+illegal+report+says/6111962/story.html#ixzz1liueZa8M

    “Researchers found that families that reduced their use of physical punishment saw a decline in aggression and anti-social behaviour in their children.”

    “Images of children’s brains gathered in another study suggested that physical punishment may change areas in the brain connected to performance on IQ tests and could increase a child’s vulnerability to drug and alcohol dependence.”

    “A 2000 Canadian study found children who were spanked were seven times more likely to be assaulted by their parents.”

    I read some typical comments today regarding this issue:

    “I was spanked, and I turned out okay.”

    Is it possible that you would have been okay without that handful of spankings? Could it be that the spankings just stand out in your memory because they were so traumatic? Didn’t your parents give you any positive parenting that could explain why you are “okay”?  Do those spankings really deserve all the credit they get? Just because you think spanking did you no harm does not mean you should have been subjected to it. Quoting Gordon H. Clark, “Children sometimes survive diphtheria or infantile paralysis but we do not try to give it to them.” “And because I am happy, and dance and sing. They think they have done me no injury…” William Blake

    “I spank my children, but only a few times!”

    If spanking is so great, then why only do it a few times? Is there something wrong with spanking that makes it acceptable to only spank a few times?

    “You should spank so your child doesn’t run into the street.”

    Do parents really rely on a past spanking to protect their children from danger? Are you that confident in a previous spanking that you would risk your child’s life?

    “There is a difference between spanking and abuse.”

    Tell that to a woman who has been hit by her husband. He just hit her a few times – but that’s not abuse? Another ridiculous line is when people insist that spanking is not beating. Duh.

    “Spanking is needed because it gets the children’s attention. Just a quick bam gets their attention.”

    Seriously. You have that poor of a relationship that you need to hit your children before they listen? Sounds like hitting in anger – the typical taboo of Spanking 101… Pick up the child. Remove him from the situation. And problem solve. Be the grown-up.

    I learned today that Canadians, even news anchors, don’t even know the existing law in Canada about spanking.

    Two Books Pre-Ordered

    | August 3, 2011

    A stern chat with Steyn
    http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/video/featured/prime-time/867432237001/a-stern-chat-with-steyn/1092810396001

    Michael Vey [Official Trailer] [HD]
    https://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=10150260801012129

    http://www.michaelvey.com/ (Educators/Homeschool: Curriculum coming soon!)

    https://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=10150260801012129

    Sharia Law in Canadian Public Schools

    | July 21, 2011

    I would say that Christian public school teachers are pretty proud of the fact that they control their religion by keeping it out of the classroom. I recall my twelve years at public school, and there was no way that I could tell that any of my teachers were Christians. I remember one teacher in particular who made it clear that he was an athiest, but outside of school, it was a surprise to find out that some of my “Christian” teachers actually had a faith. Other religions are more aggressive. With the low birth rate in Canada, it won’t be long until other religions form the majority in our democracy. Here comes Sharia Law.

    This story disgusts me. It is going on in our Canadian PUBLIC schools!!! What blatant disrespect to these young girls. How humiliating and embarassing and degrading. It is absolutely disgraceful that women’s rights activists and those who care about women are not demanding equality. AND what’s with religion in public schools anyway?! Multiculturalism has come a long way.


    Young girls segregated to the back of the room
    in Canadian public school!!

    Is Sharia Law Being Imposed in a Canadian Middle School? Ask the Menstruating Young Girls
    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/is-sharia-law-being-imposed-in-a-canadian-middle-school-ask-the-menstruating-young-girls/

    Story Highlights:
    •Critics claim Toronto District School Board is breaching Ontario’s Education Law by allowing Islamic prayer during the school day
    •An outside imam comes to the school to conduct weekly prayer meetings
    •Young girls who are menstruating are not allowed to participate and are separated from the group

    Lilley & Agar on the Toronto mosqueteria

    John Robson on Toronto mosqueteria minus menses

    Board runs afoul of Education Act with prayer services
    http://www.parentcentral.ca/parent/education/article/1022385–board-runs-afoul-of-education-act-with-prayer-services

    “Menstruating girls sat at the back, permitted to listen but not take part.”

    HOW UNCLEAN WAS MY VALLEY
    http://www.steynonline.com/content/view/4259/28/

    UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!!!

    Voting in the Canadian Election *sigh*

    | April 26, 2011

    We headed to the advanced polls on the weekend to vote for the least of evils. I had to wash my hands after I voted Progressive Conservative. I wish they had a secret small-c conservative agenda, but they don’t. :-(

    Canadian Political Parties

    In Canada, there are four “leading” political parties. They are the Conservatives, Liberals, NDP (New Democratic Party), and Québéc is allowed to elect candidates from the separatist Parti Québécois to the Canadian Parliament.

    It is truly a case of voting for the least evil party.

    The Conservatives are now in power and under Prime Minister Stephen Harper, they have been basically forbidden to even mention the word abortion. He has no intention of opening the abortion debate, and although some of the Conservative Members of Parliament are pro-life, it is expected that the slaughter of the unborn will continue under a Harper government. For the most part, the Conservative party is socially liberal, although it could be considered less liberal then the other parties. It might be called fiscally conservative, but it still spends too much.

    The Liberal party is small “l” liberal through and through. History has shown that almost every Liberal MP votes pro-abortion on life issues, and every Liberal party leader, since I remember, has been fully deserving of the pro-abortion title.

    The NDP has a completely pro-abortion, socialist platform.

    The separatist Parti Québécois has candidates only in Québéc, and they, too, are radically pro-abortion.

    In a few areas, people have the option of voting for the Christian Heritage Party.

    How did we get to this point?

    Apathy… Ignorance… Misunderstanding of true Christianity…

    Our pulpits remain silent. For the most part, the churches are completely uninvolved in politics, even though the most basic Christian values have been taken away, and many more are at risk. In Canada, abortion is permitted from conception to partial birth, for any reason, paid for by tax money. This is because human beings that have not completely left their mothers’ wombs are not considered “persons” in Canadian law.

    Until just over a week ago, the Canadian media spoke in one, solidified, radical left, liberal, and often government-funded voice. Media bias is blatant and unapologetic. With the hopeful exception of SUN NEWS, we cannot turn on Canadian television or radio and hear an alternative point of view. As a result, a great percentage of the most recent generations of people proclaim anti-life, anti-family, and anti-Christian values. There is also a general anti-American attitude. The few Canadians searching for the truth rely on the rare small “c” conservative blogs and pro-life websites.

    The Canadian educational system has been firmly entrenched in liberalism and secular humanism for at least the past twenty-five years. Public schools have no freedom of religion, nor even freedom from religion, but rather have embraced the religion of humanist indoctrination. Our universities are cranking out liberal lawyers, and reporters, and teachers, etc., left and right left.

    Huge numbers of recent immigrants do not have a Christian heritage.

    How does a Canadian Christian vote?

    In the Canadian electoral system, citizens are not permitted to vote directly for the Prime Minister. In each home riding, there are usually the three main parties represented, and we vote for the person we want to represent us as our local Member of Parliament. The party with the highest amount of Members gets its leader elected as Prime Minister.

    In this system, it is possible to elect a pro-life MP and get a pro-abortion Prime Minister at the same time. The ideal would be to have a pro-life MP and a pro-life Prime Minister, but sadly, we haven’t seen a pro-life Prime Minister in my lifetime. In a country with a small population, there have been more than 3 million unborn Canadians killed since 1969 and the same number of women wounded by abortion.

    Stephen Harper is pro-abortion, but denied at least some funding to abortions outside of Canada. Michael Ignatieff is pro-abortion and wants Canada to fund and export abortion around the world. Jack Layton is a pro-abortion extremist. In our local riding, the only candidate that responded as a pro-lifer is from the Conservative party.

    Quote from Carolyn Egan, pro-choice activist, “We believe that a majority Conservative government will put abortion at risk in this country. Prime Minister Harper has tried to assure Canadian women that we have nothing to fear from a Conservative government. We are saying very clearly today that his actions speak louder than his words and we are raising the alarm that our right to choice on abortion will be in jeopardy if he is allowed to form the next government.”

    Quote from Brian Lilley, Byline, SunNews, “A group of abortion activists gathering at the Morgentaler clinic in Toronto to call for people to vote against Stephen Harper – not for somebody, they just want to stop Stephen Harper from forming a government because they are convince that he’s a social conservative, even though I can’t find a single social conservative that will say that’s what he is. In fact, they look at him with as much suspicion as that lady you just heard from there. What’s striking about this though, and we’ll talk to our next guest about this, this was a private clinic that gets an awful lot of funding from the public healthcare system taking a political stand.”


    Canada’s most notorious abortionist, Morgentaler

    In my area, based on the voting record of our local Conservative member of Parliament and the pro-abortion or non-responding positions of the other candidates, I feel my best option is to vote Conservative. My advice is to vote for a pro-life candidate who has a record or reputation for standing up for the unborn.

    Research your local candidate here:

    http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Federal

    I take my right to vote very seriously. It wasn’t that many years ago that women, too, were considered “non-persons” and did not have the right to vote.

    Why is the abortion issue so important?

    A politician’s position on abortion is an excellent litmus test in determining his or her character and moral fiber. A person who has a strong belief in the sanctity and protection of human life from conception through natural death is more likely to care about the rights and needs of everyone. A person who believes that women can be exploited, coerced, deceived, and violated with the destruction of their unborn does not deserve your vote. If you think this is a gray issue, do some research on fetal development and post-abortion syndrome.

    In Canada, life issues have been blatantly ignored, year after year, and hope is dismal that things will change anytime soon. Christian values continue to be eroded, and the people are changing. And it is not for the good.

    Ezra made my Earth Day. Too much fun!!!!!!

    | April 26, 2011

    Ezra Levant celebrates Earth Day

    SUN NEWS Countdown: New Canadian News Channel Launches Tonight!!

    | April 18, 2011

    We get it on Bell TV – Channel 213

    Shaw Digital – Channel 177
    Shaw Direct – Channels 149 and 517
    Rogers in Toronto – Channel 15
    Rogers in Ottawa – Channels 66 or 142
    Shaw Cable Hamilton – Channel 21
    Cogeco Cable Hamilton – Channel 16
    Videotron – Channels 79 and 679

    So excited! You know how many years I waited for this kind of Canadian news station?!!! I have followed the media bias in this country for the past TWENTY-FIVE YEARS! Bell Channel 213! Here’s hoping they don’t disappoint.

    Copy Protected by Chetans WP-Copyprotect.